Sorry, that's just the truth.Īs for the memory: as I said above, don't fuck with it. The fact you're able to run some emulators decently is pretty impressive, but they aren't anything close to what, say, an i7-6600K + GTX 970 will get you. Laptops are not desktop systems, they really aren't intended for intensive things like gaming (those gaming laptops are all failures waiting to happen, don't buy into it). Don't overclock anything, don't "tweak anything". I wonder if faster ram can improve this.Įspozo, it's a laptop. Good news and bad news: Super Monkey Ball runs at a rock-solid 60fps, but F-Zero GX runs anywhere from 30 to 60 (Staying at 40 the vast majority of the time, but changing based on what position I was in and where on the track I was). I found that the forums had little to do with the development of MAME, but I found one that was for this, but they had this dumb admission thing, and I never got an acceptance email.) (I did this a couple of times, asking MAME forums about the Irem M92 and the posts were either ignored or people outright admitted they knew nothing. Anyone have any suggestions? I don't want to join forums only to find out that no one is helpful and never post there. I should probably find a good computer forum to discuss this stuff. I found the RAM in the computer only runs at 1GHz, which is crazy unbalanced with the rest of the system, (The speed was not listed when I got the computer) but I can at least replace that. I basically learned I'm not going to need to concern myself with temperature unless I overclock the CPU (it never really got all that hot according to the vague reading, even after what I describe below), and although I've heard this isn't a good idea for a laptop, I can think of several ways to improve airflow to get the CPU cooler. And yeah, sorry this wasn't a good place to ask, but I did learn what I wanted to, so I'm happy. It's all right I've come under the impression that this measures the whole CPU. Koitsu wrote: It's pretty simple: you follow the advice on their support page. powerful? Gurus? I don't know the right word. You give them tools that "show them a bunch of numbers" and somehow that makes them. This is all mainly (IMO) a result of what I call the "Gamer Effect", where you have kids with money who think they understand technology because they can build a PC, but in reality have zero familiarity with what's going on under the hood. BIOSes (both classic and UEFI) are common offenders of this too, because they're choosing to "dumb down the details" for the end-user. I cannot tell you how many times (bordering on a hundred?) I've heard people say "well XYZ app says my CPU is at 30C, but then ABC app says it's at 47C? Which is right?", when really XYZ is looking at DTS and averaging them, while ABC is looking at a HW monitoring IC, but both apps say "CPU Temperature". It's one reason why these generic Windows hardware monitoring applications are ridiculously stupid - they really don't teach this to end-users for reasons I just do not understand. Therefore: "sensor" can refer to one of several different things, with the source data coming from one of several different places. Then there's PECI, and ACPI thermal zones, and. And back on the DTS side, TjMax and all that horseshit makes things crazy. None of *that* discusses per-vendor implementation differences, such as when they choose to stick a resistor between the thermistor and the chip, changing the formulas you have to use (in software) to calculate accurate values (so what the chip manufacturer says to use for a formula is no longer accurate, and rarely if ever do the actual motherboard manufacturers public disclose such resistors/changes - it often varies per motherboard too). And that's all on-die - none of that is related to hardware monitoring ICs (sometimes part of a Super I/O chip) which provides data from external sources (particularly thermistors placed on the motherboard near/around components of interest). For example, Intel CPUs (both mobile and desktop) include DTSs, but where they choose to use a DTS (and what it associates with) is their choice model X may have a DTS per CPU core as well as 2 in the on-die GPU, but another model may have only 1 for the GPU. But really it doesn't matter, because it all boils down to choices the manufacturers make when it comes to designing the product. AMD and Intel do things very differently.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |